ArticlePLoS pathogens2023
Developing novel antimicrobials by combining cancer chemotherapeutics with bacterial DNA repair inhibitors.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratumoral Microorganisms in Tumors: Current Understanding and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Preclinical evaluation of repositioned non-antibiotic agents against Staphylococcus aureus: a network meta-analysis of survival outcomes.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Chemotherapy on the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in the Gut Microbiota of Colorectal Cancer Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based prediction of chemical accumulation in a pathogenic mycobacterium.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Identification of a novel DNA repair inhibitor using an in silico driven approach shows effective combinatorial activity with genotoxic agents against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer chemotherapeutics kill rapidly dividing cells, which includes cells of the immune system. The resulting neutropenia predisposes patients to infection, which delays treatment and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. To tackle this problem, we have isolated several compounds that inhibit bacterial DNA repair, alone they are non-toxic, however in combination with DNA damaging anti-cancer drugs, they prevent bacterial growth. These compounds were identified through screening of an FDA-approved drug library in the presence of the anti-cancer compound cisplatin. Using a series of triage tests, the screen was reduced to a handful of drugs that were tested for specific activity against bacterial nucleotide excision DNA repair (NER). Five compounds emerged, of which three possess promising antimicrobial properties including cell penetrance, and the ability to block replication in a multi-drug resistant clinically relevant E. coli strain. This study suggests that targeting NER could offer a new therapeutic approach tailor-made for infections in cancer patients, by combining cancer chemotherapy with an adjuvant that targets DNA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.