Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060573›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Assessing environmental health impacts of coal mining exploitation in Iran: A Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) approach for environmental protection.

Wang Tianliang, Zahra Aghalari, Raphael Mubanga, Juan Eduardo Sosa-Hernandez, Manuel Martínez-Ruiz, Roberto Parra-Saldívar

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wang TianliangSchool of Management, Changchun University, Changchun, China.
Zahra AghalariFaculty of Public Health, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran (I.R. Iran).ORCID 0000-0002-9629-1433
Raphael MubangaEnvironmental Planning and Management Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences-JIRCAS, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Juan Eduardo Sosa-HernandezTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Manuel Martínez-RuizTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Roberto Parra-SaldívarTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment is the process of evaluating the effects caused by a project on the environment. The outcomes generated by this assessment can lead to a reduction of the negative effects and an increase in the positive effects caused by mine projects. The present study was conducted to evaluate the environmental impact assessment of the Goliran Coal Mine in northern Iran. In the descriptive-analytical study, to achieve the objectives, observatory surveys were conducted around the coal mine using a checklist, which was about the positive and negative effects of a coal mine. Then the data were entered into the RIAM and the positive and negative effects were ranked and the most important effects were determined. In RIAM, one point is assigned to each component. 17 important activities for environmental impacts were identified using a checklist. Among the activities carried out at the coal mine site, the major ones included tunnel excavation, construction of the rail line collection and disposal of coal mine effluent, coal transportation, collection and disposal of mine tailings, and technical defects and leakage. The scores of each environmental factor were based on the four environmental components: physical/chemical, biological/ecological, social/cultural, and economic/operational. The results of the present study showed that the most negatively affected environmental components are the physical/chemical components derived from three activities; the construction of the underground tunnel; the construction of a coal transport rail line; and the actual transportation of coal extracts. The scores of each environmental factor based on the four components at the Goliran coal mine in northern Iran indicate that the highest negative score was -64, corresponding to the physical/chemical component, and was assigned to air pollution. On the other hand, the highest positive score corresponds to the economic/operational component with +54, assigned to the income that employees earn from the mine. Overall results showed that the coal mine in northern Iran had negative effects on the environment but the effects were not severe. It is suggested that for future research, corrective measures should be taken in the form of an environmental management plan to reduce the negative effects caused by coal mining, and then prospective research should be done to check the extent of reducing the negative effects.

Indexed as

Coal MiningCoalConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental HealthEnvironmental MonitoringHumansIranMiningProspective StudiesCoal

Identifiers

PMID38060573
PMCPMC10703329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.