SynthesisPloS one2023
The potential of piR-823 as a diagnostic biomarker in oncology: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating non-coding RNA profiling with HPV genotyping for cervical cancer risk stratification and early detection.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Beyond silencing: integrative multi-omics and spatial profiling unravel the systems-level role of piRNAs in HBV-driven Hepatocarcinogenesis.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Biological roles and clinical potential of piRNAs in cancer: Insights into glioblastoma.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting non-coding RNAs to overcome resistance and improving outcomes in glioblastoma.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- Epigenetic functions and biomarker potential of PIWI-interacting RNAs in oncogenesis.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Clinical implications of Alu-based cell-free DNA and serum onco-piRNA monitoring in colorectal cancer management.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Regulatory mechanisms and clinical implications of PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) in major digestive tract cancers.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Cracking the code: how piRNA pathway shapes spermatogenesis and combats male infertility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmerging evidence has demonstrated that PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) play important roles in various physiological processes and contribute to cancer progression. Moreover, piRNAs and PIWI protein levels are associated with the prognosis and chemoresistance of various cancers. The limitations of biomarkers challenge early detection and monitoring of chemoresistance and cancer relapse.
methodsTo evaluate the potential of piRNA as a diagnostic biomarker in oncology, we systematically reviewed previous studies on the subject. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to evaluate the diagnostic relevance of piRNAs in cancer. Eighteen studies (2,352 patients) were included. The quality of each study was evaluated with AMSTAR and QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS &
conclusionsThe area under the curve (AUC) values of 26 piRNAs in patients with cancer ranged from 0.624 to 0.978, with piR-9491 showing the highest value (0.978). The sensitivity of the total of 21 piRNAs in cancer patients was between 42.86 and 100, with piR-9491 showing the highest sensitivity (100). The specificity of these 21 piRNAs ranged from 60.10 to 96.67 (with piR-018569 showing the highest specificity (96.67)). Their odds ratios were between 1.61 and 44.67, and piR-12488 showed the highest odds ratio (44.67). Generally, the piRNAs in this review showed better sensitivity and AUC values than current clinical diagnostic biomarkers, although current biomarkers appear to be more specific. Reviewed piRNAs showed better diagnostic performance than currently used clinical biomarkers. Notably, piR-823 showed a significant diagnostic performance in four types of cancer (colorectal, esophageal, gastric, and renal cell cancer). However, all 18 studies included in this review were a case-control study. So, further prospective studies are required for their validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.