Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060473›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Global perspectives of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on learning science in higher education.

Shima Salehi, Cissy J Ballen, Klara Bolander Laksov, Khayala Ismayilova, Philip Poronnik, Pauline M Ross, Vicky Tzioumis, Carl Wieman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shima SalehiGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Cissy J BallenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America.
Klara Bolander LaksovCentre for the Advancement of University Teaching (CeUL), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Khayala IsmayilovaKTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Learning in Engineering Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Philip PoronnikSchool of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pauline M RossSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8714-5194
Vicky TzioumisSchool of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Carl WiemanGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required higher education institutions to rapidly transition to Emergency Remote Instruction (ERI) with little preparation. Discussions are now underway globally to learn the lessons of COVID-19 and to use this knowledge to shape the future of learning science in higher education. In this study, we examined the experiences of instructors and students to ERI in three universities across three continents-America, Europe, and Australia. We measured the instructional strategies used by instructors including assessment types, and interaction opportunities during and outside class schedules. We also measured the learning challenges experienced by students including planning, distractions, technology, learning resources, their views on educational quality and what characterized quality interactions during ERI. Our findings suggest that most instructional strategies used by instructors changed little during ERI, although the nature of instructor and student interactions during class relied more heavily on technology. Students reported significant learning challenges which included distractions from their physical and social media environments and access to technology. Both instructors and students reported that interactions with each other and their peers were concerningly low, albeit similar to pre COVID-19 pandemic levels. There were differences in the perceptions of instructors and students on whether instructor-student interactions were better or worse online. Common among all universities, there was a large proportion of students reporting mental health and work-related stress. Lessons to be learned from the COVID-19 pandemic include ensuring more support for instructors to implement effective and equitable pedagogies and an increased recognition of the importance of practicals, and the social, interactive and hands-on aspects of learning science in higher education. We predict that the incorporation of active learning pedagogies and strategies which increase student engagement and foster a sense of belonging will be ongoing global challenges for learning science in a post COVID-19 campus.

Indexed as

COVID-19Educational PersonnelHumansPandemicsProblem-Based LearningStudents

Identifiers

PMID38060473
PMCPMC10703257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.