Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060472›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Increased interpretation of deep learning models using hierarchical cluster-based modelling.

Elise Lunde Gjelsvik, Kristin Tøndel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elise Lunde GjelsvikFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8212-0326
Kristin TøndelFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.ORCID 0009-0003-0219-4443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear prediction models based on data with large inhomogeneity or abrupt non-linearities often perform poorly because relationships between groups in the data dominate the model. Given that the data is locally linear, this can be overcome by splitting the data into smaller clusters and creating a local model within each cluster. In this study, the previously published Hierarchical Cluster-based Partial Least Squares Regression (HC-PLSR) procedure was extended to deep learning, in order to increase the interpretability of the deep learning models through local modelling. Hierarchical Cluster-based Convolutional Neural Networks (HC-CNNs), Hierarchical Cluster-based Recurrent Neural Networks (HC-RNNs) and Hierarchical Cluster-based Support Vector Regression models (HC-SVRs) were implemented and tested on spectroscopic data consisting of Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) measurements of raw material dry films, for prediction of average molecular weight during hydrolysis and a simulated data set constructed to contain three clusters of observations with different non-linear relationships between the independent variables and the response. HC-CNN, HC-RNN and HC-SVR outperformed HC-PLSR for the simulated data set, showing the disadvantage of PLSR for highly non-linear data, but for the FT-IR data set there was little to gain in prediction ability from using more complex models than HC-PLSR. Local modelling can ease the interpretation of deep learning models through highlighting differences in feature importance between different regions of the input or output space. Our results showed clear differences between the feature importance for the various local models, which demonstrate the advantages of a local modelling approach with regards to interpretation of deep learning models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLeast-Squares AnalysisMolecular WeightNeural Networks, ComputerSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

Identifiers

PMID38060472
PMCPMC10703235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.