Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060289›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024

A roadmap to establishing global oncology as a priority initiative within a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.

Katherine Van Loon, Lindsay Breithaupt, Dianna Ng, Rebecca J DeBoer, Geoffrey C Buckle, Stella Bialous, Robert A Hiatt, Paul Volberding, Michelle L Hermiston, Alan Ashworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Optimization of oncological care: proposal for the creation of rehabilitation networks in head and neck oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. From Insights to Impact: Understanding Cancer Screening Choices through Mixed-Methods.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine Van LoonHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-4114
Lindsay BreithauptHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Dianna NgHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rebecca J DeBoerHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Geoffrey C BuckleHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stella BialousHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Robert A HiattHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Paul VolberdingHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michelle L HermistonHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alan AshworthHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

FIC NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the burden of cancers impacting low- and middle-income countries is projected to increase, formation of strategic partnerships between institutions in high-income countries and low- and middle-income country institutions may serve to accelerate cancer research, clinical care, and training. As the US National Cancer Institute and its Center for Global Health continue to encourage cancer centers to join its global mission, academic cancer centers in the United States have increased their global activities. In 2015, the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, San Francisco, responded to the call for international partnership in addressing the global cancer burden through the establishment of the Global Cancer Program as a priority initiative. In developing the Global Cancer Program, we galvanized institutional support to foster sustained, bidirectional, equitable, international partnerships in global cancer control. Our focus and intent in disseminating this commentary is to share experiences and lessons learned from the perspective of a US-based, National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center and to provide a roadmap for other high-income institutions seeking to strategically broaden their missions and address the complex challenges of global cancer control. Herein, we review the formative evaluation, governance, strategic planning, investments in career development, funding sources, program evaluation, and lessons learned. Reflecting on the evolution of our program during the first 5 years, we observed in our partners a powerful shift toward a locally driven priority setting, reduced dependency, and an increased commitment to research as a path to improve cancer outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNeoplasmsGlobal HealthHumansMedical OncologyNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Program EvaluationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38060289
PMCPMC10919326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.