Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060283›Full record

Trial reportJMIR human factors2023

A Newly Developed Exergame-Based Telerehabilitation System for Older Adults: Usability and Technology Acceptance Study.

Julia Seinsche, Eling D de Bruin, Enrico Saibene, Francesco Rizzo, Ilaria Carpinella, Maurizio Ferrarin, Sotiria Moza, Tanja Ritter, Eleftheria Giannouli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07074639 (S.M.A.R.T), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07074639 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

S.M.A.R.T: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Personalized Cognitive-Motor Exergame Training in Frail Community-Dwelling Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorEleftheria GiannouliRan2025 to 2027Enrolled344ConditionsAging, FrailtyArmsPersonalized, home-based motor-cognitive exergame training, Otago Exercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia SeinscheMovement Control and Learning Group, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2038-0261
Eling D de BruinMovement Control and Learning Group, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6542-7385
Enrico SaibeneIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-7627-0677
Francesco RizzoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0732-0579
Ilaria CarpinellaIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7486-0706
Maurizio FerrarinIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7797-2399
Sotiria MozaMateria Group, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-0560
Tanja RitterMovement Control and Learning Group, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0006-5401-9454
Eleftheria GiannouliMovement Control and Learning Group, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-1348
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITETH Zurich · CHKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelerehabilitation has gained significance as a tool to deliver and supervise therapy and training as effective as traditional rehabilitation methods yet more accessible and affordable. An exergame-based telerehabilitation system has recently been developed within the scope of the international Continuum-of-Care (COCARE) project. The system comprises training devices for use in clinics (Dividat Senso) and at home (Dividat Senso Flex), an assessment system, and a rehabilitation cockpit, and its focus lies on home-based motor-cognitive training, which is remotely managed by health care professionals (HPs).

objectiveThis study aims to analyze the usability, acceptance, and enjoyment of the COCARE system from the perspective of primary (older adults [OAs]) and secondary (HPs) end users.

methodsAt 3 trial sites (located in Switzerland, Italy, and Cyprus), participants engaged in a single-session trial of the COCARE system, including testing of exergames and assessments. Mixed methods encompassing qualitative approaches (eg, think aloud) and quantitative measures (eg, Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire [EEQ], System Usability Scale [SUS], and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology [UTAUT] questionnaire) were used to analyze participants' perceptions of the system and identify potential barriers to its implementation in a home setting. In addition, the associations of performance during gameplay and assessments, demographics, and training motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 [BREQ-3]) with usability, acceptance, and enjoyment were explored.

resultsA total of 45 OAs and 15 HPs participated in this study. The COCARE system achieved good acceptance ratings (OAs: 83%, range 36%-100% and HPs: 81%, range 63.8%-93.3% of the maximum score), and OAs indicated high enjoyment (mean 73.3, SD 12.7 out of 100 points in the EEQ) during the exergame session. The system's usability, assessed with the SUS, received scores of 68.1 (SD 18.8; OAs) and 70.7 (SD 12.3; HPs) out of 100 points, with substantial differences observed between the trial sites. Several requirements for improvement were identified. Commonly mentioned barriers to adoption included the movement-recognition sensitivity of the Senso Flex, its limited markings, and difficulties in understanding certain instructions for assessments and games. Performance in games and assessments showed the highest significant correlations with the SUS (Spearman ρ=0.35, P=.02 to ρ=0.52, P<.001). The BREQ-3 had significant correlations with all usability measures, thereby even large significant correlations with enjoyment (Spearman ρ=0.58; P<.001). Age had moderately significant correlations with the SUS (Spearman ρ=-0.35; P=.02) and the UTAUT total score (ρ=-0.35; P=.02) but no significant correlation with the EEQ. Concerning sex and years of education, no significant correlations were found.

conclusionsThe study's findings will inform the further development of the COCARE system toward a user-friendly and widely accepted version, enhancing cognitive and physical functions in OAs. Future randomized controlled trials should evaluate the system's feasibility and effectiveness.

Indexed as

ExergamingTelerehabilitationAgedExerciseExercise TherapyHumansPleasureexergameinformation and communications technologiesmotor-cognitive interventionolder adultstechnology acceptancetelerehabilitationusabilityuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID38060283
PMCPMC10739244
OpenAlexW4387383763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.