ArticleJAMA network open2023
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Women With Gynecologic Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limited inclusion in clinical trials and access to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer: a narrative review.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Global inequities in the adoption of innovative clinical trial designs: a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- Enhancing Community Understanding of Cancer Clinical Trials Through Peer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Strategies for optimizing clinical trial recruitment: perspectives among patients with breast cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Comparative feasibility of reasoning and non-reasoning large language models for gynecologic cancer emergency care.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Trial Enrollment and Survival Disparities Among Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Embracing and implementing the WHO cervical cancer elimination campaign goals: A consensus statement by SGO, ACOG, ASCCP, ASTRO, and ABS on minimum quality care standards for cervical cancer patients in the U.S.Gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Effect of HLA restriction on racial and ethnic disparities in access to immune therapies for advanced synovial sarcoma.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Disparities in hysterectomy-corrected endometrial cancer incidence trends by histologic subtype among racial/ethnic groups in California, 2012-2019.Gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Determinants of first-line clinical trial enrollment among Black and White gynecologic cancer patients.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Observational
- Impact of Global Enrollment on Race, Ethnicity, and Age Representation in Pivotal Gynecologic Cancer Trials Leading to US Food and Drug Administration Drug Approvals.JCO global oncology · 2025Article
- Assessment of readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trials literature at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025Article
- The role of social, economic, and medical marginalization in cancer clinical trial participation inequities: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Representation of women in clinical trials supporting FDA-approval of contemporary cancer therapies.International journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Geographic Disparities in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trial Availability in the US.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Article
- The time is now: Concrete actions are needed to improve diversity and representation in clinical trials participation.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Mediators of racial and ethnic inequities in clinical trial participation among patients with cancer, 2011-2023.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Racial Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Clinical Trial Representation: Exploring the Role of Eligibility Criteria.American journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Racioethnic Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trial enrollment are unjust and hinder development of new cancer treatments. Objective: To examine the association of race and ethnicity with clinical trial enrollment among women with endometrial, ovarian, or cervical cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based cancer registry, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), a population-based cancer registry. Population-based race and ethnicity-specific proportions for each cancer site were derived from SEER. Participants included women with an endometrial, ovarian, or cervical cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. Analyses were performed from February 2 to June 14, 2023. Exposure: Race and ethnicity were categorized as American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic (any race), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, White, and other (not defined in the National Cancer Database). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the odds of clinical trial enrollment and representation in clinical trials compared with the US population. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for associations of race and ethnicity with clinical trial enrollment within the National Cancer Database sample. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) according to diagnosis period (2004-2011 vs 2012-2019) were calculated by dividing the race and ethnicity-specific percentage of clinical trial participants in the study sample by the percentage of racial and ethnic groups in SEER. Results: Among 562 592 patients with gynecologic cancer (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 62.9 [11.3] years), 1903 were American Indian/Alaska Native, 18 680 were Asian, 56 421 were Black, 38 145 were Hispanic, 1453 were Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 442 869 were White, and 3121 were other race and ethnicity. Only 548 (<1%) were enrolled in clinical trials. Compared with White women, clinical trial enrollment was lower for Asian (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.78), Black (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99), and Hispanic (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) women. Compared with the US population, White women were adequately or overrepresented for all cancer types (PPRs ≥1.1), Black women were adequately or overrepresented for endometrial and cervical cancers (PPRs ≥1.1) but underrepresented for ovarian cancer (PPR ≤0.6), and Asian and Hispanic women were underrepresented among all 3 cancer types (PPRs ≤0.6). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of patients with gynecologic cancer, clinical trial enrollment was lower among certain minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Continued efforts are needed to address disparate clinical trial enrollment among underrepresented groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.