ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
Sulcus Tube Internal Needle Guidewire Technique for Glaucoma Drainage Device Placement: Improving Surgical Ease and Precision.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of the Ahmed clearpath glaucoma drainage device in glaucoma: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Pooled it
- Practice Patterns and Technology Readiness for Sulcus Tube Placement: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society Membership.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite the rise of micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), glaucoma drainage device implantation continues to be a mainstay among glaucoma surgical treatment options. Anterior chamber tube placement, while effective in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP), poses corneal endothelial risks. Ciliary sulcus tube placement shows promise in reduced corneal endothelial cell loss, but proper sulcus placement can be challenging. Our study describes the initial safety and effectiveness results using a novel sulcus tube internal needle guidewire (STING) technique for glaucoma drainage device insertion into the ciliary sulcus.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the charts of all consecutive patients who underwent the STING technique using the Ahmed ClearPath, Ahmed Glaucoma Valve, or Baerveldt glaucoma implant with at least 6 months of follow-up. Demographic characteristics, type of glaucoma, previous medical and surgical treatment, pre- and postoperative IOP, pre- and postoperative medications, complications, and success rates were recorded.
resultsOut of nine eyes, seven resulted in qualified success (77.8%). Preoperative mean IOP was 23.8 ± 6.3 mmHg, and postoperative IOP decreased significantly to 14.9 ± 3.7 mmHg (p = 0.008). The average number of preoperative medications per patient was 4.4 ± 0.7, while the average number of postoperative medications per patient was reduced significantly to 3.6 ± 1.0 (p = 0.039).
conclusionThe STING technique is a novel method for placing a glaucoma drainage device into the ciliary sulcus, leading to IOP lowering with minimal complications. The STING technique is designed to improve surgical ease and increase anatomical precision of sulcus tube placement. Video available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.