Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060072›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2024

The effects of procedural and conceptual knowledge on visual learning.

Nadja Beeler, Esther Ziegler, Andreas Volz, Alexander A Navarini, Manu Kapur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadja BeelerProfessorship for Learning Sciences and Higher Education, ETH Zurich, RZ Building, Clausiusstrasse 59, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. nadja.beeler@gess.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7276-0752
Esther ZieglerProfessorship for Learning Sciences and Higher Education, ETH Zurich, RZ Building, Clausiusstrasse 59, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5282-2028
Andreas VolzDermatologie am Rhein, Blumenrain 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander A Navarini *Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Burgfelderstrasse 101, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-632X
Manu Kapur *Professorship for Learning Sciences and Higher Education, ETH Zurich, RZ Building, Clausiusstrasse 59, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2232-6111

Funding

Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich Innovedum fund (grant number 2035)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though past research suggests that visual learning may benefit from conceptual knowledge, current interventions for medical image evaluation often focus on procedural knowledge, mainly by teaching classification algorithms. We compared the efficacy of pure procedural knowledge (three-point checklist for evaluating skin lesions) versus combined procedural plus conceptual knowledge (histological explanations for each of the three points). All students then trained their classification skills with a visual learning resource that included images of two types of pigmented skin lesions: benign nevi and malignant melanomas. Both treatments produced significant and long-lasting effects on diagnostic accuracy in transfer tasks. However, only students in the combined procedural plus conceptual knowledge condition significantly improved their diagnostic performance in classifying lesions they had seen before in the pre- and post-tests. Findings suggest that the provision of additional conceptual knowledge supported error correction mechanisms.

Indexed as

LearningChecklistClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsConceptual knowledgeMedical educationMelanoma detectionProcedural knowledgeSkin lesion classification

Identifiers

PMID38060072
PMCPMC11368992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.