ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2023
Sex Differences in Cardiac Transplantation.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long COVID sequelae in heart transplant recipients.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Current status and geographic inequities in solid organ and corneal transplantation in Ecuador (2010-2022).PeerJ · 2026Article
- Efficacy of ivabradine in heart rate reduction after cardiac transplantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Trends in Heart Transplantation and Outcome Analysis: Nationwide Study Using the National Inpatient Sample and Readmission Database.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death: a meta-analysis of national registries.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Aortic pulse wave analysis and functional capacity of heart transplantation candidates: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Heart Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiomyopathies in Women.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe goal of this review was to summarize contemporary evidence surrounding sex differences in heart transplantation (HT). RECENT
findingsWomen have steadily comprised approximately 25% of waitlist candidates and HT recipients. This disparity is likely multifactorial with possible explanations including barriers in referral to advanced heart failure providers, implicit bias, and concerns surrounding sensitization. Women continue to experience higher waitlist mortality at the highest priority tiers. After HT, there are differences in post-transplant complications and outcomes. Future areas of study should include sex differences in noninvasive surveillance, renal outcomes after transplantation, and patient-reported outcomes. There are important sex-specific considerations that impact candidate selection, donor matching, waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Concerted efforts are needed to improve referral patterns to ensure transplantation is allocated equally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.