ArticleSurgery today2024
Thoracoscopic precision excision technique for small lung lesions using radiofrequency identification marking.
Article in Surgery today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional simulation-based wedge resection for non-palpable small lung lesions.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of radiofrequency identification tag accuracy using bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy and virtual navigation guidance before segmentectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Thoracoscopic precision excision technique for small non-palpable lesions using radiofrequency identification lung marking system.Journal of visualized surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the introduction of multi-detector computed tomography (CT), the number of incidentally detected small lung nodules has dramatically increased. Determination of lung nodule malignancy is crucial, and an early diagnosis of these indeterminate lesions can lead to subsequent potentially curative treatment. However, there are some limitations to excising these nodules with sublobar resection in a minimally invasive thoracoscopic setting. Under thoracoscopy, although stapler-based wedge resection seems to be the preferred technique, particularly in patients whose lesions are located far from the edge of the lobe, the stapler can unexpectedly sacrifice normal pulmonary parenchyma. To overcome this issue, we have developed a wireless excision precision technique using cone-beam CT-guided electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy in a minimally invasive thoracoscopic setting. Our technique is implemented in a hybrid operating room, and small tumors can be removed using a radiofrequency identification microchip without intraoperative fluoroscopy and do not require lung palpation under thoracoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.