Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059891›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2024

The neural control of movement: a century of in vivo motor unit recordings is the legacy of Adrian and Bronk.

Dario Farina, Simon Gandevia

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. High performance sorting of motor unit action potentials with EMUsort.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dario FarinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Simon GandeviaNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Imperial College London · GBNeuroscience Research Australia · AU

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T020970/1HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 810346National Health and Medical Research Council RG193455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In two papers dated 1928 to 1929 in The Journal of Physiology, Edgar Adrian and Detlev Bronk described recordings from motor nerve and muscle fibres. The recordings from motor nerve fibres required progressive dissection of the nerve until a few fibres remained, from which isolated single fibre activity could be detected. The muscle fibre recordings were performed in humans during voluntary contractions with an intramuscular electrode - the concentric needle electrode - that they describe for the first time in the second paper. They recognised that muscle fibres would respond to each impulse sent by the innervating motor neurone and that therefore muscle fibre recordings provided information on the times of activation of the motor nerve fibres which were as accurate as a direct record from the nerve. These observations and the description of the concentric needle electrode opened the era of motor unit recordings in humans, which have continued for almost a century and have provided a comprehensive view of the neural control of movement at the motor unit level. Despite important advances in technology, many of the principles of motor unit behaviour that would be investigated in the subsequent decades were canvassed in the two papers by Adrian and Bronk. For example, they described the concomitant motor neurones' recruitment and rate coding for force modulation, synchronisation of motor unit discharges, and the dependence of discharge rate on motor unit recruitment threshold. Here, we summarise their observations and discuss the impact of their work. We highlight the advent of the concentric needle, and its subsequent influence on motor control research.

Indexed as

Motor NeuronsMuscle Fibers, SkeletalElectrodesElectromyographyHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNerve FibersRecruitment, Neurophysiologicalconcentric needleelectromyographymotor neuronemotor unitmuscle

Identifiers

PMID38059891
PMCPMC10952757
OpenAlexW4389452868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.