Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059648›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Estimating the contribution of the porcine fecal core microbiota to metabolite production via mathematical modeling and

Salvatore Galgano, Helen Kettle, Andrew Free, Jos G M Houdijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salvatore GalganoMonogastric Science Research Centre, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-3206
Helen KettleBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Andrew FreeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jos G M HoudijkMonogastric Science Research Centre, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Funding

Scotland's Rural College (SRUC) Research Excellence Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The swine gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem found throughout the gastrointestinal tract, with multiple exchanges with the host and whose composition is linked to both external and internal factors, such as diet or breed. Diet, probiotic, or prebiotic interventions have been designed to boost beneficial host-microbiota interactions, such as the production of anti-inflammatory molecules, or the fermentation of otherwise undigested resources. In parallel, a smaller microbial population, shared among the same host species, independent of external or internal factors, has been described and defined as the "core microbiota." Therapies targeting the core microbiota could possibly lead to more precise and long-lasting effects. However, the metabolic role of the porcine core microbiota, especially in relation to the rest of the microbial community, is currently missing. We present here the first dynamic model of the porcine core microbiota, which we used to estimate the core-microbiota metabolite production and to forecast the effect of a synbiotic intervention targeting the core genera of the core microbiota. We developed a community model in which a total of 17 microbial groups were established based on culture-based information of representative species. First, the model parameters were estimated, and the resulting model simulations were compared favorably with

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFermentationGastrointestinal TractModels, TheoreticalSwinecore microbiotain vitro fermentationmathematical modelingmicrobiotapig

Identifiers

PMID38059648
PMCPMC10805034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.