Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059432›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2024

Demonstrating the immunostimulatory and cytokine-augmentation effects of bacterial ghosts on natural killer cells and Caenorhabditis Elegans.

Sreeja Narayanan, Adheena Panangattu Baburajan, Mumtaz Muhammad, Andrea Joseph, Praveen Kumar Vemula, Sarita Ganapathy Bhat

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bacterial ghosts (BGs): A promising approach as candidate vaccine.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sreeja NarayananDepartment of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7351-8957
Adheena Panangattu BaburajanDepartment of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Mumtaz MuhammadDepartment of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Andrea JosephDepartment of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Praveen Kumar VemulaChemical Biology Approaches for Stem Cells and Therapeutics, Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sarita Ganapathy BhatDepartment of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Cochin University of Science and Technology · INInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/E/18/1/504318Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of bacteria-based immunotherapy lies in its ability to inherently enhance immune responses. However, the "liveness" of bacteria poses risks of bacterial escape, nonspecific immuno-stimulation, and ethical concerns, limiting their acceptability in immunotherapy. In this scenario, nonliving empty bacterial-cell envelopes, named bacterial ghosts (BGs), have emerged as immuno-stimulants with the potential to side-step the limitations of live bacterial therapies. This study demonstrates the capability of BGs in modulating the functionality of NK-92 cells and Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), as well as perform as cytokine-therapy adjuvants. BGs were obtained through a pH-driven culture method, and were validated for their structural and chemical integrity via electron microscopy and spectroscopy. In NK-92 cells, BGs have shown significant immuno-stimulation by boosting the gene-expression of perforin, granzyme-B, Fas-L, and interferon-gamma by factors of 3.5-, 1.5-, 12.5-, and 8.6-folds, respectively. Combined BG and IL-12 treatment yielded a notable 10.2-fold increase in interferon-gamma protein expression in 24 h. The BGs also significantly influenced the innate immune response in C. elegans through the upregulation of lysozyme genes viz., ilys-3 (8.8-fold) and lys-2 (3.1-fold). Our investigation into the impact of BGs on natural killer cells and C. elegans highlights its potential as a valid alternative approach for new-age immunotherapy and cytokine augmentation.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCytokinesAnimalsBacteriaInterferon-gammaKiller Cells, NaturalCytokinesInterferon-gammabacterial ghostC. elegansimmuno-modulationimmunotherapynatural killer cells

Identifiers

PMID38059432
PMCPMC7615764
OpenAlexW4389452818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.