Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059229›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurosciences in rural practice

Influence of pesticide exposure on farmers' cognition: A systematic review.

Suelen Finhler, Gabriela Putton Marchesan, Cristian Ferreira Corona, Andressa Talita Nunes, Karen Cristine Silva De Oliveira, Amanda Tapia de Moraes, Letiére Cabreira Soares, Fernanda Oliveira Lima, Camila Dalmolin, Dalila Moter Benvegnú

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ethnic and Sex Differences in the Association Between Organochlorine Exposure and Cognitive Function in Late Life.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suelen FinhlerCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-9175
Gabriela Putton MarchesanCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-2181
Cristian Ferreira CoronaCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9803-342X
Andressa Talita NunesCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7028-6441
Karen Cristine Silva De OliveiraCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6092-4788
Amanda Tapia de MoraesCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-9072
Letiére Cabreira SoaresCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-7089
Fernanda Oliveira LimaCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-1216
Camila DalmolinCampus Pato Branco, Centro Universitário Mater Dei, Pato Branco, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9478-1511
Dalila Moter BenvegnúCampus Realeza, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Realeza, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul · BRFaculdade de Pato Branco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Pesticide application has become necessary to increase crop productivity and reduce losses. However, the use of these products can produce toxic effects. Farmers are individuals occupationally exposed to pesticides, thus subject to associated diseases as well as cognitive impairment. However, this relation is not well established in the literature, requiring further investigation. To assess the potential association between farmers' pesticide exposure and cognitive impairment, we followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, considering participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study strategies. Materials and Methods: This study included articles published between 2000 and 2021 on the Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed databases, retrieved by the terms " Results: In total, ten studies fit the established criteria and were included in the sample. All had farmers occupationally exposed to pesticides in their sample and only one study dispensed with a control group. Of the neurobehavioral tests, four studies used mini-mental state examination, six neurobehavioral core test batteries (tests recognized in the area), and the remaining, other tests. We observed that 90% of articles found an association between cognitive impairment and pesticide exposure. Overall, five studies measured the activity of cholinesterases in their sample, of which three found significant differences between groups, confirming intoxication in those exposed. Conclusion: Despite the limited number of trials, we found scientific evidence to support the existence of adverse effects of pesticides on farmers' cognition. We recommend that future studies research similar projects, expanding knowledge on the subject.

Indexed as

AgricultureCognitionMemoryPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysesToxicity

Identifiers

PMID38059229
PMCPMC10696351
OpenAlexW4387670924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.