Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059219›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024

Does an excision of needle bone biopsy tract affect the prognosis in patients with primary bone tumor?

Amisha Gami, Ashini Shah, Sunitha Shankaralingappa, Abhijeet Ashok Salunke, Jahnavi Gandhi, Keval Patel, Nandlal Bharwani, Priti Trivedi, Shashank Pandya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amisha GamiDepartment of Onco Pathology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Ashini ShahDepartment of Onco Pathology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sunitha ShankaralingappaDepartment of Onco Pathology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Abhijeet Ashok SalunkeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Jahnavi GandhiDepartment of Onco Pathology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Keval PatelDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Nandlal BharwaniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Priti TrivediDepartment of Onco Pathology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Shashank PandyaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opinion remains divided as to whether excision of needle biopsy tract is beneficial and affect the prognosis. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes in patients of primary malignant bone tumor who had undergone surgery with or without biopsy tract excision. Methods: From January 2017 to June 2020, 240 patients with primary malignant bone tumors who underwent percutaneous needle biopsy followed by surgery were included. We categorized patients into Biopsy tract excision (Group1:185 patients) and Non Biopsy tract excision (Group 2:55 patients). Median follow-up of patients was 58.6 months (range; 12-61.8months). Results: Demographics, histopathological type, tumor location, type of surgery were similar in biopsy tract excision and non excision group. We found biopsy tract seeding in two cases out of 185 (1.1 %). Local recurrence in biopsy tract excision and non excision group was observed in 3.2 % and 1.8 % respectively with p value 0.58. The mean local recurrence free survival rate in group 1 and 2 was 60 and 44 months respectively. Limb salvage was performed in 71.6 % and in amputation in 28.3 % cases. The local recurrence in limb-salvage and amputation group was observed in 3.4 % (6/172) and 1.4 % (1/68) respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the rate of local recurrence between patients who were treated by biopsy tract excision or non tract excision. Percutenous needle bone biopsy tract leads to minimal risk of tumor seeding during surgical resection of primary bone tumors.We recommend the further multi centre studies with more number of patients to reach a consensus on resection of needle biopsy tract during surgical management of primary bone tumors.

Indexed as

Biopsy tract excisionBiopsy tract seedingLocal recurrenceNeedle bone biopsyOpen bone biopsyPercutenous bone biopsyPrimary bone tumors

Identifiers

PMID38059219
PMCPMC10696180
OpenAlexW4388751878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.