Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059213›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024

Intrawound navigation for custom-made acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty: Does it improve implant positioning?

Rashid M Tikhilov, Anton N Kovalenko, Alisagib A Dzhavadov, Stanislav S Bilyk, Igor I Shubnyakov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 65% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rashid M TikhilovVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Anton N KovalenkoVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Alisagib A DzhavadovVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Stanislav S BilykVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Igor I ShubnyakovVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The number of hip revisions makes up over 12 % of all hip arthroplasty cases. For large acetabular defects custom-made acetabular component (CMAC) are required. Rates of malposition of CMACs are highly variable. Our study aims to develop a readily available, reliable and easily reproducible method for positioning of the CMAC. We tried to answer the following questions: 1) how often does the postoperative position of the implant corresponds to the planned one; 2) is the use of intrawound navigation improve the precision of acetabular implant position. Methods: This was a single-center observational cohort study and included two groups: the experimental group (use of 3D navigation for implant positioning) and the control group (no navigation use). All the patients were scheduled for acetabular revision surgery with custom-made 3D-printed acetabular components. All surgeries took place between 2016 and 2020. Results: 25 % freehand group, 85 % implants in the navigation group matched accuracy positioning criteria. The relative risk of malposition was significantly higher without the intraoperative navigation, with 5 times greater risk of malpositioning in the freehand group versus the navigation group. Conclusion: Navigation method allows planning of the implant and reamer sizes for optimal bone preparation and preservation. It provides easier implantation of the complex implant with reliable, stable primary fixation in massive bone defects. It reliably decreases malposition rate, allowing for implant placement in a proper position with sufficient bone-implant contact. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between CMAC position accuracy and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Indexed as

Custom-made acetabular implantsHip jointRevision total hip arthroplastyStandard acetabular implantsThree-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID38059213
PMCPMC10696182
OpenAlexW4388766776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.