Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059206›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2023

Effects of a return to work program on the health and barriers to returning to work in head and neck cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Ya-Lan Chang, Bing-Shen Huang, Chien-Yu Lin, Ching-Fang Chung, Shu-Ching Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04322695 (A Rehabilitation Education Care Program on Return to Work Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors - Improve Disability and Barriers of Return to Work), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04322695 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Rehabilitation Education Care Program on Return to Work Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors - Improve Disability and Barriers of Return to Work

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung University of Science and TechnologyRan2021 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsRehabilitation Education Care Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ya-Lan ChangDepartment of Nursing, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Bing-Shen HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chien-Yu LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ching-Fang ChungDepartment of Nursing, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shu-Ching ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung University of Science and Technology · TWLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a return to work (RTW) program on perceived health status, barriers to returning to work, fear of cancer progression, social support, physical function, and psychosocial function in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial with repeated measures was conducted. The 70 HNC patients were randomly assigned into two groups: 35 in the experimental group (RTW) and 35 in the control group (usual care). Patients were assessed at four time points: baseline (T0) (6 months after completing treatment), and then at 9-, 12-, and 15-months (T1, T2, and T3, respectively) after completing treatment. Patients completed a self-reported questionnaire, including measures of perceived health status, barriers to returning to work, fear of cancer progression, social support, physical function, and psychosocial function. Results: Patients in the experimental group had significantly greater perceived health status and better psychosocial function compared to those in the control group. Compared to T0, at T4, participants in both groups had significantly lower levels of barriers to returning to work, fear of cancer progression, social support, and higher levels of physical function. Conclusions: The RTW program effectively improved perceived health status and psychosocial function in HNC patients. Survivorship care should include a transitional return-to-work program to help patients transition back to work. Trial registration: NCT04322695.

Indexed as

Head and neck cancerInterventionReturn to workReturn to work programSurvivorshipTransitional care

Identifiers

PMID38059206
PMCPMC10696387
OpenAlexW4387704015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.