Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38059008›Full record

ArticleJournal of mammalogy2023

Diet selection in the Coyote

Matt W Hayward, Carl D Mitchell, Jan F Kamler, Paul Rippon, David R Heit, Vilis Nams, Robert A Montgomery

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mammalogy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Matt W HaywardConservation Science Research Group, College of Engineering, Science and the Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2207, Australia.
Carl D MitchellWayan, Idaho 83285, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0740-1232
Jan F KamlerWildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13 5QL, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4148-2088
Paul RipponSchool of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2207, Australia.
David R HeitUniversity of New Hampshire, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA.
Vilis NamsDepartment of Plant, Food and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Campus, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia B2N 5E3, Canada.
Robert A MontgomeryWildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13 5QL, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-0589
University of Oxford · GBDalhousie University · CAUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of New Hampshire · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coyote (

Indexed as

Canis latransCoyotedietJacobs’ indexpredator–preyprey preferences

Identifiers

PMID38059008
PMCPMC10697429
OpenAlexW4388482798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.