ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2023
Spanish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) for Ankle Fractures.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Weight-Bearing Versus Non-Weight-Bearing After Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary Management and Rehabilitation of Severe Crush Injury Resulting in Lisfranc Fracture: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) into Spanish and to assess its reliability and validity. Methods: The translation and adaptation to develop the Spanish version of the OMAS (OMAS-Sp) was performed according to current international guidelines. The OMAS-Sp was administered to 98 patients with a surgically treated ankle fracture, and it was repeated 7-14 days later to assess construct reliability of each question's score and the total score. Test-retest reliability and the internal consistency were calculated, and concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the OMAS-Sp with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). The presence of floor and ceiling effects was also analyzed. Results: Adequate internal consistency was found with a Cronbach α of 0.821. Excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated with an interclass correlation coefficient for the total score of 0.970 (95% CI 0.956-0.980; Conclusion: The OMAS-Sp demonstrated adequate psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for assessing outcomes in Spanish-speaking patients with surgically treated ankle fractures. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.