Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058944›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2020

Online Clinical Teaching: A Simple Model to Facilitate Students' Communication and Clinical Reasoning Skills on Distance Learning e-Platform.

Kallyan Debnath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kallyan DebnathAIMST University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. One of the most important outcomes expected from clinical teaching is to develop an adequate level of clinical reasoning skills among the students. This largely depends on the efficient retrieval of information from the patients, desirably in the way of direct history taking and physical examination. Communication skills play a vital role in making this activity maximally effective. In any situation when the direct contact between students and patients becomes restricted or compromised, a suitable alternative seems to appear to be a 'felt need' to support the students remain active and engaged in a similar kind of learning. During this ongoing pandemic, an online teaching model was devised to instruct a group of undergraduate medical students which appeared to be promising to facilitate their clinical reasoning (CR) and communication skills (CS) in a virtual environment. There is scope to make it more effective and to get it incorporated into our clinical curriculum as a part of its regular e-learning component. Out of a total of five weeks of online clinical posting, the initial two to three weeks' period was spent on teaching the very basics of the subject such as clinical anatomy, pathophysiology, and the most common and most important clinical conditions. This was then followed by the online history-taking sessions where the students played the roles of both simulated patients and student-doctors. The whole session was directly supported and supervised by a clinical instructor who offered constructive feedback at the various levels of the session. The method was well-accepted by the students, and it helped them develop confidence in terms of knowledge and skills that they later translated into their real workplace training effectively.

Indexed as

breakout room for history takingClinical reasoningcommunication skillsdistance learninge-platformonline clinical teaching

Identifiers

PMID38058944
PMCPMC10697431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.