Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058859›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2020

A CREATIVE approach to designing a contemporary medical curriculum.

Shazia Iqbal, Shahzad Ahmad, David Taylor, Jaye McIsaac, Turky H Almigbal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shazia IqbalAlfarabi College of Medicine Riyadh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-5864
Shahzad AhmadFatima Memorial Medical and Dental College Lahore Pakistan.
David TaylorGulf Medical University Ajman UAE.
Jaye McIsaacAuckland University of Technology New Zealand.
Turky H AlmigbalKing Saud University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. In medical education, Outcome-based Education (OBE) is facing many challenges due to the rapid proliferation in biomedical sciences; technology-enhanced learning; globalization of health system, and the availability of various pedagogical techniques. A steady stream of evidence-based developments challenges those who are responsible for sustaining and improving their medical curricula. Curriculum reform is a dynamic process and there is no explicit approach that can serve as a guide for a curriculum reviewer while making amendments in the OBE integrated curriculum. This study took place in a medical college in Saudi Arabia and it highlights the key components to be considered while reviewing the Bachelor in Medicine and Surgery (MBBS) course specifications and curriculum. It suggests the importance of course reports as the main driving force for curriculum reforms. Delineating major and minor changes in the curriculum and frequency of amendments in course specifications also remains a questionable task and requires established institutional guidelines. Furthermore, based on practical experience in the periodic curriculum review process, the authors suggest some best practice. We present a

Indexed as

contemporary medical curriculumcurriculum evaluationMedical educationOBE Integrated curriculum review and reformsOutcome-based Education (OBE)SPICES based integrated curriculum

Identifiers

PMID38058859
PMCPMC10697502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.