Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058853›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2023

Impact of novel software on laboratory expenditure at an academic hospital in South Africa.

Zoliswa Mayekiso, Kelechi E Oladimeji, Guillermo A Pulido Estrada, Charles Hongoro, Teke R Apalata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoliswa MayekisoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-7428
Kelechi E OladimejiEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0246-5595
Guillermo A Pulido EstradaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-2059
Charles HongoroDevelopmental, Capable and Ethical State Division, Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-4940
Teke R ApalataDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-3864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Countries across the globe report an increase in expenditure associated with medical laboratory testing. In 2020, the United States Department of Health and Human Services reported that laboratory test expenditures increased by $459 million US dollars (USD) from $7.1 billion USD in 2018. In South Africa, laboratory testing expenditure in the public sector increased from $415 million USD in 2014 to $723 million USD in 2021. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an innovative software, electronic gatekeeping (EGK), on medical laboratory test expenditures at Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital, in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an interrupted time series analysis technique was used to evaluate trends in expenditure during a 48-month study period. To measure the impact of EGK on laboratory expenditure, we analysed laboratory expenditure over two study periods: a period of 24 months occurring before EGK implementation (01 June 2013 to 31 May 2015) and a period of 24 months occurring during EGK implementation (01 June 2015 to 30 May 2017). Results: There was a significant reduction (211 928 fewer tests) in the number of tests performed during the intervention (434 790) compared to before the intervention (646 718). Laboratory test expenditure was $1 663 756.72 USD before the intervention period and $1 105 036.88 USD during the intervention period, demonstrating a cost savings of $558 719.84 USD. Conclusion: Electronic gatekeeping is a cost-effective intervention for managing medical laboratory expenditures. We recommend that the health sector scale up this intervention nationally. What this study adds: Using an interrupted time series interval, the authors determined that EGK is a cost-effective intervention for managing medical laboratory expenditures at a tertiary hospital. This study's findings can promote and contribute to improved laboratory systems and test investigations.

Indexed as

academic hospitalcost-effectivenessElectronic gatekeepinginterrupted time series analysisinterventionmedical laboratory expenditureruralSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID38058853
PMCPMC10696537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.