ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Deep learning-based diagnosis of lung cancer using a nationwide respiratory cytology image set: improving accuracy and inter-observer variability.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in nongynecologic cytology: A systematic review of current research and commercial tools.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in cytopathological applications for cancer: a review of accuracy and analytic validity.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- PathViT Model for Automated Disease Classification from Skeletal Muscle Histopathology.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Practice of Cytopathology in Korea: A 40-Year Evolution Through Standardization, Digital Transformation, and Global Partnership.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Review
- National quality assurance program using digital cytopathology: a 5-year digital transformation experience by the Korean Society for Cytopathology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in Digital Cytopathology Since COVID-19: Insights from a Narrative Review of Review Articles.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated recognition and segmentation of lung cancer cytological images based on deep learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- AI in Cytopathology: A Narrative Umbrella Review on Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- A Critical Review of Deep Learning Technique and Its Applications in Clinical Cytology.Journal of cytologyReview
- Cytopathology 2.0: How Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Future of Cytopathology.Journal of cytologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL)-based image analysis has recently seen widespread application in digital pathology. Recent studies utilizing DL in cytopathology have shown promising results, however, the development of DL models for respiratory specimens is limited. In this study, we designed a DL model to improve lung cancer diagnosis accuracy using cytological images from the respiratory tract. This retrospective, multicenter study used digital cytology images of respiratory specimens from a quality-controlled national dataset collected from over 200 institutions. The image processing involves generating extended z-stack images to reduce the phase difference of cell clusters, color normalizing, and cropping image patches to 256 × 256 pixels. The accuracy of diagnosing lung cancer in humans from image patches before and after receiving AI assistance was compared. 30,590 image patches (1,273 whole slide images [WSIs]) were divided into 27,362 (1,146 WSIs) for training, 2,928 (126 WSIs) for validation, and 1,272 (1,272 WSIs) for testing. The Densenet121 model, which showed the best performance among six convolutional neural network models, was used for analysis. The results of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 95.9%, 98.2%, and 96.9% respectively, outperforming the average of three experienced pathologists. The accuracy of pathologists after receiving AI assistance improved from 82.9% to 95.9%, and the inter-rater agreement of Fleiss' Kappa value was improved from 0.553 to 0.908. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a DL model was effective in diagnosing lung cancer in respiratory cytology. By increasing diagnostic accuracy and reducing inter-observer variability, AI has the potential to enhance the diagnostic capabilities of pathologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38058836PMC10695775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.