ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Integrated multiplex network based approach reveled CC and CXC chemokines associated key biomarkers in colon adenocarcinoma patients.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- CC/CXC chemokine risk signature at single-cell resolution: a machine learning model for precision stratification in cervical cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is a prevalent and aggressive form of cancer that necessitates the identification of robust biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, this project was launched to identify a few key biomarkers from CC and CXC chemokine families for the accurate detection of COAD. Hub gene identification was performed using CytoHubba analysis. Clinical samples from COAD patients and normal individuals were collected and subjected to appropriate methods for DNA and RNA extraction. The expression levels of hub genes were analyzed using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), while promoter methylation analysis was conducted using targeted bisulfite sequencing (bisulfite-seq). Additionally, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were utilized to validate the findings based on clinical samples. CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10), CXCL12 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12), CXCL16 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16), and CCL25 (CC motif chemokine ligand 25) were denoted as the key hubs among CC and CXC chemokine families. Through RT-qPCR analysis, it was found that CXCL10, CXCL12, and CXCL16 were significantly up-regulated, while CCL25 was down-regulated in COAD patients compared to healthy controls. Later on, these findings were also validated using TCGA and GEO datasets consisting of COAD and normal control samples. Furthermore, we investigated the promoter methylation status of these chemokine genes in COAD patients. Our results revealed significant dysregulation of promoter methylation, suggesting an epigenetic mechanism underlying the altered expression of CXCL10, CXCL12, CXCL16, and CCL25 in COAD. In addition to this, various additional aspects of the CCL25, CXCL10, CXCL12, and CXCL16 have also been uncovered in COAD during the present study. This study highlights the dysregulation of CXCL10, CXCL12, CXCL16, and CCL25 chemokine members in COAD patients, emphasizing their significance as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the management of this deadly disease. However, further investigations are warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and evaluate the clinical utility of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38058831PMC10695786W4389452511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.