ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Clinical study of classification and regression tree assisted endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating epigenetic and metabolic indicators for non-invasive endometrial cancer triage: a machine learning approach.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Decision Tree Model for Predicting the Overall Survival of Endometrial Cancer Patients with Adenomyosis.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- The effect of adjuvant mitotane therapy of the adrenocortical carcinoma on the endometrium and its clinical consequences in menstruating women. Literature review and authors' own experiences.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma is critical for improving patient survival and prognosis. However, the diagnostic efficiency of a single examination is often insufficient, because it is easy to cause misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses. Therefore, this study used the classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm to establish and validate a CART model to distinguish endometrial carcinoma from other endometrial lesions. The clinical data of 297 patients treated at Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University between April 2021 and April 2023 for postmenopausal uterine effusion, postmenopausal vaginal bleeding, abnormal uterine bleeding and endometrial thickening were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 203 cases of endometrial carcinoma and 94 cases of endometrial lesions. The pathological results from endometrial biopsy and hysteroscopic curettage were compared. The coincidence rate of endometrial biopsy was 90.34% (187/207) and the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma were 0.920, 0.914, and 0.925, respectively. Six serological indicators with diagnostic significance were screened out: carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), D-dimer, and absolute neutrophil count (N). The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of the CART model based on the above indicators were 0.949, 0.979, and 0.896, respectively. The CART model is an intuitive and simple tool for the clinical diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and endometrial lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38058822PMC10695821W4389452624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.