Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058781›Full record

ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2023

International study on the prevalence of malnutrition in centralized care for colorectal cancer patients.

Carl Meissner, Svenja Tiegges, Martin Broehl, Ronny Otto, Karsten Ridwelski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Screening, identification, and diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A retrospective cohort study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carl MeissnerAn-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin gGmbH an der Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Svenja TieggesWissWerk, PubliCare GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Martin BroehlWissWerk, PubliCare GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Ronny OttoAn-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin gGmbH an der Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Karsten RidwelskiKlinikum Magdeburg gGmbH, Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with different diseases may show signs of malnutrition both before and during the hospital stay. The presence of malnutrition may impact the recovery and length of stay and consequently the costs. Early identification of malnutrition is thus a critical factor. The objective of this multicenter study is to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in colorectal cancer centers. Another objective is to investigate possible consequences, such as complications or length of stay. In addition, the study aims to demonstrate the relevance of nutrition management in colorectal cancer centers. At the same time, relevant requirements clearly demanded by the Certification Commission for Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers are met through implementation of the study. Methods: Between 2019 and 2021, patients in colorectal cancer centers were examined in the preoperative phase. In addition to questions about patients' state of health and nutrition, the validated screening forms-Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening Tool 2002 (NRS 2002)-were used to assess malnutrition. The data were processed by univariate analysis. Results: In total, data records of 3,102 patients were evaluated. The mean age of the participants was 68.5 ± 11.9 years, and their average body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 5.3 kg/m Conclusions: Approximately one in three to four patients with a colorectal carcinoma has an increased risk of malnutrition. The two screening methods calculated a different prevalence (23 and 38 %). Any malnutrition that is present demonstrably has a significant impact both on the rate of complications and the length of stay and may therefore have a decisive influence on the costs. The results of this multicenter study underscore the need for systematic screening for malnutrition and at the same time should increase clinics awareness of the importance of establishing a nutrition management policy.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer centercolorectal carcinomalength of staymalnutritionNRS screeningnutrition managementSGA score

Identifiers

PMID38058781
PMCPMC10696944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.