Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058736›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2023

An

Shiva Ganjali, Maryam Matbou Riahi, Khadijeh Mahboobnia, Milad Iranshahy, Maciej Banach, Ali Jangjoo, Sorour Ashari, Zahra Tayarani-Najaran, Amirhossein Sahebkar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shiva GanjaliIMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.
Maryam Matbou RiahiApplied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Khadijeh MahboobniaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Milad IranshahyDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Maciej BanachDepartment of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Ali JangjooTargeted Drug Delivery Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sorour AshariApplied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Zahra Tayarani-NajaranMedical Toxicology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amirhossein SahebkarApplied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Lodz · PLThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the possible role of urolithin A (UA) and urolithin B (UB) on the mRNA expression levels of LDL receptor (LDLR) and PSCK9 genes, and also of the uptake of LDL particles in HepG2 cells. Material and methods: The potential role of UA and UB on the induction of LDL uptake and the expression of its regulatory genes was explored using HepG2 cells and curcumin (20 μM), berberine (50 μM), UA (80 μM), and UB (80 μM) as the treatments in the experimental tests. Results: The LDL uptake and cell-surface LDLR were higher in cells treated with UA in comparison with cells treated with UB, and even in relation to the cells treated with curcumin and berberine as positive controls. In addition, cells treated with UB showed approximately 2 times greater LDLR expression levels compared with curcumin (FC = 2.144, Conclusions: The present results suggest that UA was more effective than UB in promoting LDL uptake as well as cell surface LDLR in HepG2 cells. This effect seems to be mostly mediated through the suppression of PCSK9 expression but not the induction of LDLR expression.

Indexed as

HepG2LDL receptorLDL uptakePCSK9urolithin Aurolithin B

Identifiers

PMID38058736
PMCPMC10696988
OpenAlexW4380631605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.