Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058680›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

The use of electronic health record embedded MRC-ICU as a metric for critical care pharmacist workload.

Andrew J Webb, Bayleigh Carver, Sandra Rowe, Andrea Sikora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J WebbDepartment of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3425-7181
Bayleigh CarverDepartment of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.
Sandra RoweDepartment of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Andrea SikoraDepartment of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Augusta, GA 30912, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2020-0571

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS029009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: A lack of pharmacist-specific risk-stratification scores in the electronic health record (EHR) may limit resource optimization. The medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score was implemented into our center's EHR for use by clinical pharmacists. The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate MRC-ICU as a predictor of pharmacist workload and to assess its potential as an additional dimension to traditional workload measures. Materials and methods: Data were abstracted from the EHR on adult ICU patients, including MRC-ICU scores and 2 traditional measures of pharmacist workload: numbers of medication orders verified and interventions logged. This was a single-center study of an EHR-integrated MRC-ICU tool. The primary outcome was the association of MRC-ICU with institutional metrics of pharmacist workload. Associations were assessed using the initial 24-h maximum MRC-ICU score's Pearson's correlation with overall admission workload and the day-to-day association using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling. Results: A total of 1205 patients over 5083 patient-days were evaluated. Baseline MRC-ICU was correlated with both cumulative order volume (Spearman's rho 0.41, Discussion and conclusion: The MRC-ICU is a validated score that has been previously correlated with important patient-centered outcomes. Here, MRC-ICU was modestly associated with 2 traditional objective measures of pharmacist workload, including orders verified and interventions placed, which is an important step for its use as a tool for resource utilization needs.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacycritical careintensive caremedication regimen complexitymedication safetypharmacy practice models

Identifiers

PMID38058680
PMCPMC10697785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.