ArticleJournal of cytology
Cervical Cytology and Histology Correlation as an Analytic Quality Assurance Exercise: Experience from an Accredited Cytology Laboratory.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytology-Biopsy Concordance in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive Women with Abnormal Cytology Findings: Menopause-Stratified Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Cervical cytology screening in a newly established government medical college: A bethesda-based reporting analysis.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The performance parameters of cervical cytology in any accredited cytology laboratory requires implementation of quality control exercise, which ensures acceptable performance by a laboratory. This study aims to assess the analytical aspect of quality control measures by evaluating the frequency and accuracy of epithelial abnormalities as detected in cervical Pap smears using histopathologic diagnosis as the gold standard. Methods: A retrospective diagnostic test study from 2018 to 2020 was conducted. Out of the total 6000 Pap smears, histopathologic correlation was available in 150 cases in the form of colposcopic-directed biopsy (CDB) and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) tissue in 105 cases. The quality control measures analyzed were Atypical Squamous Cell: Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (ASC: SIL) ratio, cyto-histo correlation, and study parameters like sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Pap smears as against CDB and LEEP. Results: 4.5% smears were reported as inadequate, 92.3% as Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), followed by epithelial abnormality found in 3.21%. The ASC: SIL ratio was 1.3:1. Concordance rate against CDB was 100% in Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 82.35% in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), 82% in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), 65.6% in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and 50% in Atypical Squamous Cell ,High grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion can not be ruled out (ASC-H). Total concordance rate was 84.15%. Sensitivity of Pap smear was 65% for LSIL and 82% for HSIL. Specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 63.63%, 90%, and 75%, respectively. Concordance rate was 96% with LEEP. Conclusion: Quality control measures give an insight of performance of any accredited cytology laboratory. This exercise needs to be conducted on a regular basis, so that relevant steps can be taken in case of major discrepancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.