ArticleHeliyon2023
Evaluation of the ABL NGS assay for HIV-1 drug resistance testing.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep sequencing reveals underestimated burden of integrase inhibitor resistance mutations in people living with HIV: a global individual patient data meta-analysis.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HIV evolution and variability around the world requires special monitoring of the viral strains in infected people. High-throughput HIV sequencing and drug resistance testing techniques have become routinely available over the last few years. We conducted a study to assess the new CE-marked ABL NGS HIV genotyping assay on an Illumina® platform, to compare the results (the detection of resistance associated mutations (RAMs) detected in the three main targets: reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase) with those produced by three Sanger-based assays, and to compare the assays' respective costs. For the 10 samples and a 20 % sensitivity threshold for the NGS technology, the percent agreement between the four assays ranged from 99.5 % to 100 %. We detected 4 more and 10 more RAMs of interest when we lowered the NGS assay's threshold to 10 % and 3 %, respectively. At a threshold of 3 %, the antiretroviral sensitivity interpretation algorithm (for protease inhibitors) was modified for only two patients. The NGS assay's unit cost fell rapidly as the number of samples per run increased. Compared with Sanger sequencing, the ABL NGS HIV genotyping assay is just as robust and somewhat more expensive but opens up interesting multiplexing perspectives for virology laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.