ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Asthma Action Plan Completion Rates across Five Divisions in an Academic Children's Hospital.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disseminating a Pediatric Oncology Critical Care Intervention in Latin America and Spain: An Integrated-Knowledge-Translation Approach.Global implementation research and applications · 2026Article
- Improving Asthma Guideline Implementation in Hospital Medicine (ImAGINE): A Single-site Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Project BREATHE: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma is the most common chronic disease among children. Asthma Action Plans (AAPs) enable asthma self-management tailored to each patient and should be updated annually. At our institution, providers face challenges in creating reliable processes to consistently complete AAPs for patients with asthma. This project's aim was to increase the percentage of patients across five hospital divisions who have an up-to-date AAP from 80% in May 2021 to 85% by October 1, 2021. Methods: We launched a quality improvement (QI) project using the Model for Improvement, focusing on improving AAP completion rates across five hospital divisions providing ambulatory care for asthma patients. The divisions (Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Allergy, Pulmonary, and two Primary Care sites) participated in the QI process using tools to understand the problem context. They implemented a cross-divisional AAP completion competition from June to October 2021. Each month during Action Periods, divisions trialed their interventions using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. We held monthly Learning Sessions for divisions to collaborate on successful intervention strategies. Results: Statistical process control chart analysis demonstrated that the overall AAP completion rate increased from a baseline of 80% to 87% with the initiation of the competition. All divisions showed improvement in AAP completion rates during the active intervention period, but sustainment varied. Conclusions: The cross-divisional competition motivated five divisions to improve processes to increase AAP completion rates. This approach effectively fostered engagement and idea sharing to boost performance, and may be considered for other QI projects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.