Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058420›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2023

Attempt to Establish Prognostic Predictive System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence for Assistance with Selection of Treatment Modality.

Atsushi Hiraoka, Takashi Kumada, Toshifumi Tada, Hidenori Toyoda, Kazuya Kariyama, Takeshi Hatanaka, Satoru Kakizaki, Atsushi Naganuma, Ei Itobayashi, Kunihiko Tsuji and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Atsushi HiraokaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Takashi KumadaDepartment of Nursing, Gifu Kyoritsu University, Ogaki, Japan.
Toshifumi TadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
Hidenori ToyodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
Kazuya KariyamaDepartment of Hepatology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Takeshi HatanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Satoru KakizakiDepartment of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Japan.
Atsushi NaganumaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Japan.
Ei ItobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Japan.
Kunihiko TsujiCenter of Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Toru IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Hideko OhamaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Fujimasa TadaGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Kazuhiro NousoDepartment of Hepatology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Real-life Practice Experts for HCC (RELPEC) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Because of recent developments in treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), methods for determining suitable therapy for initial or recurrent HCC have become important. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) findings to establish a system for predicting prognosis of HCC patients at time of reoccurrence based on clinical data as a reference for selection of treatment modalities. Methods: As a training cohort, 5,701 observations obtained at the initial and each subsequent treatment for recurrence from 1,985 HCC patients at a single center from 2000 to 2021 were used. The validation cohort included 5,692 observations from patients at multiple centers obtained at the time of the initial treatment. An AI calculating system (PRAID) was constructed based on 25 clinical factors noted at each treatment from the training cohort, and then predictive prognostic values for 1- and 3-year survival in both cohorts were evaluated. Results: After exclusion of patients lacking clinical data regarding albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade or tumor-node-metastasis stage of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, 6th edition (TNM-LCSGJ 6th), ALBI-TNM-LCSGJ 6th (ALBI-T) and modified ALBI-T scores confirmed that prognosis for patients in both cohorts was similar. The area under the curve for prediction of both 1- and 3-year survival in the validation cohort was 0.841 (sensitivity 0.933 [95% CI: 0.925-0.940], specificity 0.517 [95% CI: 0.484-0.549]) and 0.796 (sensitivity 0.806 [95% CI: 0.790-0.821], specificity 0.646 [95% CI: 0.624-0.668]), respectively. Conclusion: The present PRAID system might provide useful prognostic information related to short and medium survival for decision-making regarding the best therapeutic modality for both initial and recurrent HCC cases.

Identifiers

PMID38058420
PMCPMC10697750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.