Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058370›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2023

Clinical profile and treatment outcomes of Boerhaave's syndrome: A 13-year experience from an upper gastrointestinal surgical unit.

Suraj Surendran, Coelho Victor, Myla Yacob, Negine Paul, Sudhakar Chandran, Anoop John, Ebby George Simon, Inian Samarasam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suraj SurendranClinic of General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4836-9432
Coelho VictorClinic of General Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-2957
Myla YacobClinic of General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-5239
Negine PaulClinic of General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-1985
Sudhakar ChandranClinic of General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-5049
Anoop JohnClinic of Medical Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-6658
Ebby George SimonClinic of Medical Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-2434
Inian SamarasamClinic of General and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7800-9318
Christian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: IBoerhaave's syndrome (BS) is a rare, but potentially fatal condition, characterized by barogenic esophageal rupture and carries a high mortality. We aimed to study our institutional experience of managing patients with BS. Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with BS presenting to a tertiary care centre from 2005 to 2018 was carried out in this study. Clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluations, treatments received, and treatment outcomes were studied. Perforations were classified as early (<24 hours) and delayed (>24 hours), based on the time elapsed. Surgical complications were graded using Clavien-Dindo grade. The Pittsburgh perforation severity score was correlated with short-term treatment outcomes. Results: Of the 12 patients [male, 75%; mean (range) age, 53 (28-80) years] included, 10 patients had a delayed (>24 hours) presentation. Chest pain was the dominant symptom (58.3%); six patients presented either in shock (n= 1) or with organ failure (n= 3) or both (n= 2). All the perforations were sited in the lower thoracic esophagus, of which three were contained and nine were uncontained. The seal of the perforation was achieved by surgical repair in four patients (primary repair, 2; repair over a T-tube, 2) and endoscopic techniques in four patients (clipping, 1; stenting, 3). Sepsis drainage [surgical, 7 (open-5, minimally-invasive-2); non-surgical, 5] and feeding jejunostomy were performed in all patients. Five (41.7%) patients received a re-intervention. Median (range) hospital stay was 25.5 (12-101) days, 30-day operative morbidity was 50%, and there was one in-hospital death. The Pittsburgh perforation severity score was as follows: 2-5 in two patients and >5 in 10 patients; there were more delayed presentations, increased surgical interventions, post-procedure morbidity, and in-hospital mortality in the latter group, but the differences were statistically not significant. In 11 patients followed-up [median (range):1507 (17-5929) days], there was no disease recurrence, symptomatic reflux or dysphagia. Conclusion: Favourable treatment outcomes, including reduced mortality and organ preservation can be achieved for Boerhaave's perforations, through a multimodality approach. Minimally invasive, endoluminal or open surgical techniques may be safely utilized in its management. The Pittsburgh severity score can be a useful clinical tool that can be used to select the initial intervention and to predict treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Boerhaave’s syndromePittsburgh perforation severity scorespontaneous esophageal perforationsurgerytherapeutic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38058370
PMCPMC10696438
OpenAlexW4389452539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.