Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058357›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: Future directions for implementation.

Ivonne Suridjan, Wiesje M van der Flier, Andreas U Monsch, Nerida Burnie, Robert Baldor, Marwan Sabbagh, Josep Vilaseca, Dongming Cai, Margherita Carboni, James J Lah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Ivonne SuridjanRoche Diagnostics International Ltd Rotkreuz Switzerland.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Neurology, Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC location VUmc Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Andreas U MonschMemory Clinic University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER Basel Switzerland.
Nerida BurnieGeneral Practice, South West London CCG London UK.
Robert BaldorDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health UMass Chan Medical School, North Worcester Massachusetts USA.
Marwan SabbaghBarrow Neurological Institute Dignity Health/St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix Arizona USA.
Josep VilasecaDepartment of Medicine Universitat de Vic-Central Catalonia University Vic Spain.
Dongming CaiAlzheimer's Disease Research Center Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA.
Margherita CarboniRoche Diagnostics International Ltd Rotkreuz Switzerland.
James J LahGoizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHDignity Health · USEmory University · USFelix Platter-Hospital · CHGeneral Electric (United Kingdom) · GBUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ESUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Minnesota · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) will increase diagnostic demand. A non-invasive blood-based biomarker (BBBM) test for detection of amyloid-β pathology may reduce diagnostic barriers and facilitate DMT initiation.

objectiveTo explore heterogeneity in AD care pathways and potential role of BBBM tests.

methodsSurvey of 213 healthcare professionals/payers in US/China/UK/Germany/Spain/France and two advisory boards (US/Europe).

resultsCurrent diagnostic pathways are heterogeneous, meaning many AD patients are missed while low-risk patients undergo unnecessary procedures. Confirmatory amyloid testing (cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers/positron emission tomography) is utilized in few patients, resulting in diagnostic/treatment delays. A high negative-predictive-value test could streamline the diagnostic pathway by reducing unnecessary procedures in low-risk patients; supporting confirmatory testing where needed. Imminent approval of DMTs will increase need for fast and reliable AD diagnostic tests. DISCUSSION: An easy-to-use, accurate, non-invasive BBBM test for amyloid pathology could guide diagnostic procedures or referral, streamlining early diagnosis and DMT initiation. Highlights: This study explored AD care pathways and how BBBM may meet diagnostic demandsCurrent diagnostic pathways are heterogeneous, with country and setting variationsMany AD patients are missed, while low-risk patients undergo unnecessary proceduresAn easy-to-use, accurate, non-invasive BBBM test for amyloid pathology is neededThis test could streamline early diagnosis of amyloid pathology and DMT initiation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamyloid pathologyblood‐based biomarkerclinical practicediagnosisqualitativescreening

Identifiers

PMID38058357
PMCPMC10696162
OpenAlexW4389343629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.