Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058296›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

DNABERT-based explainable lncRNA identification in plant genome assemblies.

Monica F Danilevicz, Mitchell Gill, Cassandria G Tay Fernandez, Jakob Petereit, Shriprabha R Upadhyaya, Jacqueline Batley, Mohammed Bennamoun, David Edwards, Philipp E Bayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. PolyA-GLM: A comprehensive framework forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monica F DanileviczSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Mitchell GillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Cassandria G Tay FernandezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Jakob PetereitSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Shriprabha R UpadhyayaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Mohammed BennamounSchool of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Australia.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long non-coding ribonucleic acids (lncRNAs) have been shown to play an important role in plant gene regulation, involving both epigenetic and transcript regulation. LncRNAs are transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides that are not translated into functional proteins but can be translated into small peptides. Machine learning models have predominantly used transcriptome data with manually defined features to detect lncRNAs, however, they often underrepresent the abundance of lncRNAs and can be biased in their detection. Here we present a study using Natural Language Processing (NLP) models to identify plant lncRNAs from genomic sequences rather than transcriptomic data. The NLP models were trained to predict lncRNAs for seven model and crop species (

Indexed as

Cross-species predictionDeep learningGenomic motifLncRNAsNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38058296
PMCPMC10696397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.