Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38058274›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2024

Anti-Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4 Autoantibodies and Disease Duration as Predictors of Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Laura C Cappelli, David Hines, Hong Wang, Clifton O Bingham, Erika Darrah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Glycosaminoglycans activate peptidylarginine deiminase 4 by enhancing calcium affinity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura C CappelliJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2795-7059
David HinesJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hong WangJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clifton O BinghamJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-5029
Erika DarrahJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1119-0279
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Sample Processing and Immunoassay Research CoreP30AR070254 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Antony Rosen · 2016 to 2026
$8.9M
Understanding Inflammatory Arthritis due to Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsK23AR075872 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAPPELLI, LAURA CHRISTINE · 2019 to 2023
$779k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR075872NIAMS NIH HHS K23-AR075872NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070254NIAMS NIH HHS P30-AR070254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that autoantibodies to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) are associated with erosive disease in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this study was conducted to compare the clinical and prognostic use of anti-PAD4 antibodies in patients with early and established RA.

methodsSera from patients with early (duration <2 years; n = 422) or established (duration ≥2 years; n = 359) RA from two randomized clinical trials of tofacitinib ± methotrexate compared with adalimumab + MTX or MTX alone were evaluated for the presence of anti-PAD4 and anti-PAD3/4 antibodies at baseline and posttreatment time points. Summary statistics were calculated for demographic, clinical, and serological characteristics, and generalized estimating equations were used to model clinical outcomes by disease duration according to anti-PAD4 status.

resultsAnti-PAD4 antibodies were present in 22% and 40% of patients with early and established RA, respectively, stable following treatment, and associated with baseline joint damage only in established RA. In early RA, baseline anti-PAD4 antibodies were associated with a greater improvement in disease activity score 28-joint count using C-reactive protein levels after treatment compared with individuals with negative anti-PAD4 (P = 0.049). Tofacitinib ± MTX was more broadly efficacious than MTX alone at improving clinical outcomes in early and established RA, irrespective of anti-PAD4 status (P < 0.05 for all), whereas adalimumab + MTX exhibited differential benefits in achieving disease activity score remission in early RA (P = 0.036) and American College of Rheumatology 20 responses in established RA (P = 0.002).

conclusionDifferences in prevalence, clinical associations, and treatment-response outcomes according to anti-PAD4 antibody status in early and established RA suggests the existence of a therapeutic window to prevent the accumulation of irreversible joint damage in early patients with RA with anti-PAD4 antibodies.

Identifiers

PMID38058274
PMCPMC10867292
OpenAlexW4389453093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.