ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2023
Adaptive-Partitioning Multilayer Dynamics Simulations: 2. Implementations of the Permuted and Interpolated Adaptive-Partitioning Gradients.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, an adaptive-partitioning multilayer Q1/Q2/MM method was proposed, where Q1 and Q2 denote, respectively, two distinct quantum-mechanical levels of theory and MM, the molecular-mechanical force fields. Such a multilayer model resembles the ONIOM (our own N-layered integrated molecular orbital and molecular mechanics) model by Morokuma and co-workers, but it is distinguished by on-the-fly reclassifying atoms to be Q1, Q2, or MM in dynamics simulations. To smoothly blend the levels of descriptions of the atoms, buffer zones are introduced between adjacent layers, and the energy is smoothly interpolated. In particular, the Q1/Q2 interaction energy was expressed in two different formalisms: permuted and interpolated adaptive-partitioning (PAP and IAP), respectively. While the PAP energy is based on a weighted many-body expansion, the IAP energy is derived via alchemical quantum calculations with interpolated Fock and overlap matrices. In this article, we examine in-depth the irregularities in the IAP energy near the boundary between the buffer and Q2 zones, which were found prominent in some calculations. These irregularities are due to basis-set linear dependencies, which can be effectively suppressed using a cutoff for the weighted atomic orbital coefficients. Furthermore, we derived and implemented the gradients for both PAP and IAP. Test calculations on a series of water cluster models show perfectly smooth gradients in PAP, while a minor discontinuity occurs in IAP gradients at the buffer/Q2 boundary. The energy and gradient discontinuities in IAP become smaller when moving the buffer/Q2 boundary further away from the Q1 center and when increasing the size of the basis sets used. Overall, those discontinuities are controllable, and possible ways to further diminish them are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.