Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2024
Mixed methods, single case design, feasibility trial of a motivational conversational agent for rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury.
Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Usability and User Experience Assessment of Health Care Conversational Agents Using Validated Subjective Instruments: Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2026Pooled it
- Does the Digital Therapeutic Alliance Exist? Integrative Review.JMIR mental health · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) incorporates client-centred goal-setting and motivational support to achieve goals. However, face-to-face rehabilitation is time-limited. New therapy approaches which leverage care are warranted. Conversational agents (CAs) offer a human-computer interface with which a person can converse. This study tested the feasibility, usability and acceptability of using a novel CA - RehabChat - alongside brain injury rehabilitation.
designMixed methods, single case design, feasibility pilot trial.
settingAmbulatory and community brain injury rehabilitation.
participantsAdults with TBI receiving brain injury rehabilitation and clinicians providing this care.
interventionFollowing 1:1 training, client-clinician dyads used RehabChat for two weeks alongside usual care. MAIN MEASURES: Pre-post clinical measures (Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire, Rehabilitation Therapy Engagement Scale, Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Relative, Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self) repeated measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, researcher-developed wellbeing screening questions); and post-intervention (System Usability Scale (SUS), semi-structured 1:1 interview).
resultsSix participants (two clients and four clinicians) completed training. Two client-clinician dyads completed the intervention. Two other clinicians used RehabChat in a mock client-clinician session. SUS scores indicated good usability. Client well-being did not deteriorate. No adverse events were experienced. Interviews indicated RehabChat was feasible, acceptable and easy to use; and supported motivation, goal-setting and completing practice activities.
conclusionsRehabChat was feasible and acceptable to use alongside usual ambulatory and community brain injury rehabilitation, had good usability and supported client needs. Further testing of RehabChat with a larger cohort for longer duration is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.