Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057754›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2023

One-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker in thoracic patients.

Paulo Andrés Cano, Luis Carlos Mora, Irene Enríquez, Matías Santiago Reis, Eva Martínez, Fernando Barturen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulo Andrés CanoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, 07120, Spain. pauloandresc@gmail.com.
Luis Carlos MoraDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, 07120, Spain.
Irene EnríquezDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, 07120, Spain.
Matías Santiago ReisDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, 07120, Spain.
Eva MartínezDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, 07120, Spain.
Fernando BarturenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, 07120, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Son Espases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung isolation is a technique used in a multitude of surgeries to ensure single-lung ventilation with collapse of the contralateral lung, as to achieve improved access and visualization of relevant anatomical structures. Despite being accepted and having favorable outcomes, bronchial blockers (BBs) are not to this day the main device of choice among anaesthesiologists.

methodsIn this retrospective and descriptive study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of a BB in all types of thoracic surgeries in our centre between 2015 and 2022, excluding patients with massive hemoptysis or empyema, or who had undergone a prior pneumonectomy.

resultsOne hundred and thirty-four patients were intervened due to lung cancer (67.9%), respiratory disease (23.9%), and non-respiratory disease (8.2%) undergoing lung surgeries (65.7%), pleural and mediastinal surgeries (29.9%), chest wall surgeries (3.0%) and other surgeries (1.5%). In most cases, lung collapse was considered excellent (63.9%) or good (33.1%) with only 4 cases (3.0%) of poor lung collapse. More than 90% of patients did not present intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. No statistically significant differences were found between lung collapse and the demographic, clinical or BB-related variables (p > 0.05). However, we found a significatively higher proportion of excellent lung collapses in VATS surgeries and lateral decubitus positioning, as well as a significatively less proportion of poor lung collapses (p < 0.05). Moreover, there was a significantly higher proportion of excellent lung collapses when the BB was placed in the left bronchus (p < 0.05).

conclusionsWith these results, in our experience BBs constitute an effective alternative, capable of achieving pulmonary collapse in all kinds of thoracic procedures with satisfactory safety rates due to their minimal complications.

Indexed as

One-Lung VentilationPulmonary AtelectasisThoracic Surgical ProceduresBronchiHumansIntubation, IntratrachealRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedBronchial blockerLung collapseSingle-lung ventilationThoracic Surgery

Identifiers

PMID38057754
PMCPMC10698967
OpenAlexW4389393867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.