ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2024
Identification of Optimal Tissue-Marking Dye Color for Pathological Evaluation in Fluorescence Imaging Using IRDye800CW.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative assessment of grade, T stage, and lymph node involvement: machine learning-based CT texture analysis in colon cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFluorescence-guided surgery using a tumor-specific antibody-dye conjugate is useful in various cancer types. Fluorescence imaging is a valuable tool both intraoperatively and postoperatively for ex vivo imaging. The color of inks used for tumor specimens during ex vivo specimen processing in pathology is an important consideration for fluorescence imaging since the absorption/emission of the dyes may interfere with the fluorescent dye. This study assesses suitable ink colors for use specifically with IRDye800CW fluorescence imaging. PROCEDURES: Eight tissue-marking inks or dyes (TMDs) commonly used for pathological evaluation were assessed. Agarose tissue-mimicking phantoms containing Panitumumab-IRDye800CW were used as an initial model. Mean fluorescence intensity was measured at 800 nm using both Pearl Trilogy as a closed-field fluorescence imaging system and pde-neo II as an open-field fluorescence imaging system before and after TMD application. An in vivo mouse xenograft model using the human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma FaDu cell line was then used in conjunction with TMDs.
resultsThe retained IRDye800CW fluorescence on Pearl Trilogy was as follows: yellow at 91.0 ± 4.5%, red at 90.6 ± 2.7%, orange at 88.2 ± 2.2%, violet at 56.6 ± 1.1%, lime at 40.9 ± 1.8%, green at 19.3 ± 2.8%, black at 13.3 ± 0.6%, and blue at 8.1 ± 0.2%. The retained IRDye800CW fluorescence on pde-neo II was as follows: yellow at 86.5 ± 6.4%, red at 77.0 ± 6.2%, orange at 76.9 ± 2.8%, lime at 72.5 ± 9.5%, violet at 59.7 ± 0.4%, green at 30.1 ± 6.9%, black at 17.0 ± 2.7%, and blue at 6.7 ± 1.7%. The retained IRDye800CW fluorescence in yellow and blue TMDs was 42.1 ± 14.9% and 0.2 ± 0.2%, respectively in the mouse experiment (p = 0.039).
conclusionYellow, red, and orange TMDs should be used, and blue and black TMDs should be avoided for evaluating tumor specimens through fluorescence imaging using IRDye800CW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38057647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.