Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057603›Full record

SynthesisJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2024

Tea consumption and risk of bone health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fuding Zhou, Ting Wang, Lexun Li, Jinchuan Yu, Zhengxiang Liu, Jianghui Zhang, Guangjun Wang, Jiujiu Li, Changsheng Shao, Peng Wang and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Osteoporosis in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study in Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fuding Zhou *Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Ting Wang *Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Lexun LiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Jinchuan YuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Zhengxiang LiuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Jianghui ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Guangjun WangSchool of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Jiujiu LiHefei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, 230041, Anhui, China.
Changsheng ShaoKey Laboratory of High Magnetic Field and Ion Beam Physical Biology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230026, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China. pengwang@ipp.ac.cn.
Wenjun ChenDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China. chenwj71024@163.com.
Anhui Medical University · CNHefei Institutes of Physical Science · CNAnhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent research evaluating the association between tea consumption and bone health still has inconsistent findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe electronic databases of Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception until December 2022 to identify eligible studies. The calculation of summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was carried out using random-effects models. I

resultsThe pooled relative risks for bone health-related outcomes of interest among tea drinkers, compared to non-drinkers, were 0.910 (95% confidence interval 0.845 to 0.980) for fractures, based on 20 studies, 0.332 (0.207-0.457) for BMD (13 studies), 0.800 (0.674-0.950) for osteoporosis (10 studies), and 1.006 (0.876-1.156) for osteopenia (5 studies). Subgroup analysis of locations showed that the pooled relative risks were 0.903 (0.844-0.966) for the hip, 0.735 (0.586-0.922) for the femur, 0.776 (0.610-0.988) for the lumbar, 0.980 (0.942-1.021) for the forearm and wrist, 0.804 (0.567-1.139) for the phalanges, and 0.612 (0.468-0.800) for Ward's triangle. One-stage dose-response analysis revealed that individuals who consumed less than 4.5 cups of tea per day had a lower risk of bone health-related outcomes than those who did not consume tea, with statistically significant results.

conclusionThere is an association between tea consumption and a reduced risk of fractures, osteoporosis, hip, femur, and lumbar, as well as increased BMD.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesTeaBone DensityBone Diseases, MetabolicFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosisRisk FactorsTeaBone healthBone mineral densityFractureOsteoporosisTea consumption

Identifiers

PMID38057603
OpenAlexW4389372914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.