Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057584›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024

Psychological impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): TRIDENT-2 study.

Iris M Bakkeren, Lidewij Henneman, Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki, Linda Martin, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Marike G Polak, Mireille N Bekker, Robert-Jan H Galjaard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Placental biomarkers for the prediction of neurodevelopmental disorders.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Solving medical mysteries with genomics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Iris M BakkerenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. i.bakkeren@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0009-0007-9113-3536
Lidewij HennemanDepartment of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elsbeth H van Vliet-LachotzkiVSOP - Patient Alliance for Rare and Genetic Diseases, Soest, the Netherlands.
Linda MartinDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3041-6536
Janneke T Gitsels-van der WalDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-7246
Marike G PolakDepartment of Psychology, Education & Child Studies (DPECS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-5480
Mireille N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-4291
Robert-Jan H GaljaardDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. r.galjaard@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8101-6180
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) 543002001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Netherlands, genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is offered to all pregnant women as part of the nationwide TRIDENT-2 study. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13, which are called "additional findings", are reported only on request of the pregnant woman. This study examined: (1) women's pre-test perceptions and reasons to opt for additional findings and (2) women's experiences with- and the psychological impact of being informed about an additional finding. A questionnaire, consisting of the anxiety measure State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), distress measure Impact of Event Scale (IES) and questions developed specifically for this study, was retrospectively administered to 402 women who received an additional finding. A total of 227 (56.5%) women completed the questionnaire. Most (60.2%) chose to know additional findings because they wanted as much information as possible about the health of their fetus. Almost all (92%) stated that receiving the additional finding was unexpected, a shock, and/or they were in disbelief, for 85% it caused a lot of worry. Post-test, high anxiety (STAI) levels were reported in 15.5% of women, and 7.5% reported severe distress (IES). Women who gave birth to an affected child (n = 10) experienced most psychological impact (STAI and IES). Eighty-six percent of women with a fetal aberration would opt for additional findings again, compared to 49.2% of women whose result was confined to the placenta. Pre-test counseling should focus on explaining the different results NIPT can generate. Post-test counseling should focus on guiding pregnant women through this uncertain and anxious time.

Indexed as

Down SyndromePrenatal DiagnosisChildFemaleFetusHumansMalePlacentaPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38057584
PMCPMC10923886
OpenAlexW4389409128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.