Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057560›Full record

Trial reportEye (London, England)2024

Short-term outcomes of Mitomycin-C augmented phaco-trabeculectomy using subconjunctival injections versus soaked sponges: a randomized controlled trial.

Sabyasachi Chakrabarty, Mohideen Abdul Kader, Devendra Maheshwari, Madhavi Ramanatha Pillai, Shivkumar Chandrashekharan, Rengappa Ramakrishnan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of subconjunctival or subtenon injection versus soaked sponge mitomycin C in trabeculectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabyasachi ChakrabartyDepartment of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Services, Vivekananda Mission Ashram Netra Niramay Niketan, Chaithanyapur, India. sc5992@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7489-4305
Mohideen Abdul KaderDepartment of Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Hospital & PG Institute of Ophthalmology, Tirunelveli, India.
Devendra MaheshwariDepartment of Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Hospital & PG Institute of Ophthalmology, Tirunelveli, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-1106
Madhavi Ramanatha PillaiDepartment of Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Hospital & PG Institute of Ophthalmology, Tirunelveli, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4620-6955
Shivkumar ChandrashekharanDepartment of Cataract Services, Aravind Eye Hospital & PG Institute of Ophthalmology, Tirunelveli, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-1708
Rengappa RamakrishnanDepartment of Glaucoma Services, Aravind Eye Hospital & PG Institute of Ophthalmology, Tirunelveli, India.
Aravind Eye Hospital · INNiramaya Healthcare · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether subconjunctival Mitomycin-C (MMC) injections are as safe and effective as sponge-soaked MMC in phaco-trabeculectomy.

methodsThis prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted on consecutive patients with visually significant cataract and an uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. One hundred thirty-nine patients were recruited but 15 were ineligible for analysis. The patients were randomized into a sponge/injection group. All participants received a twin-site phaco-trabeculectomy. They were followed up on days 1, 15, 30, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

interventionsParticipants in the sponge group received an augmentation of their phaco-trabeculectomy with sponges soaked in a mixture of 0.04% MMC and 2% preservative-free Lignocaine in a 1:1 ratio, placed in the subconjunctival space for four minutes. Participants in the injection group received the same mixture as a subconjunctival injection, after surgical draping.

resultsThere were 62 patients in each group. The groups had no significant differences in their baseline characteristics. The mean IOP at 6 months was significantly lower in the injection group (14.8 ± 3.7 mm Hg) than in the sponge group (17.1 ± 6.4 mm Hg) (p = 0.02). There was no notable difference in the complications or the final post-operative visual outcome but a significantly greater number of patients in the sponge arm required removal of the releasable suture (p = 0.001) and additional anti-glaucoma medications (p = 0.04) at six months post-operatively.

conclusionsSubconjunctival MMC achieves a lower IOP with fewer anti-glaucoma medications than sponge-soaked MMC at six months for twin-site phaco-trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma with no additional risks.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Open-AngleTrabeculectomyAntiglaucoma AgentsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureMitomycinProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntiglaucoma AgentsMitomycin

Identifiers

PMID38057560
PMCPMC11009277
OpenAlexW4389373545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.