Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057504›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2024

A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Student Reflections Following Participation in a Canadian Radiation Oncology Studentship.

Brandon S Chai, Meredith Giuliani, Joanne Alfieri, Jeffrey Cao, Andrea Bezjak, Michael Kim, Che Hsuan David Wu, Nauman Malik, David Y Mak, Paris-Ann Ingledew

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of YouTube Videos Related to Radioactive Iodine Therapy for Thyroid Cancer for Patient Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Brandon S ChaiFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joanne AlfieriDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jeffrey CaoCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Andrea BezjakRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Che Hsuan David WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency- Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Nauman MalikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
David Y MakRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paris-Ann IngledewDepartment of Surgery, Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. pingledew@bccancer.bc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1912-3276
University of Toronto · CABC Cancer Agency · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to radiation oncology in medical school curricula is limited; thus, mentorship and research opportunities like the Dr. Pamela Catton Summer Studentship Program attempt to bridge this gap and stimulate interest in the specialty. In 2021, the studentship was redesigned as virtual research, mentorship, and case-based discussions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explores the impact of COVID-19 on the studentship, on students' perceptions of the program, and on medical training and career choice. Fifteen studentship completion essays during 2021-2022 were obtained and anonymized. Thematic analysis was performed to interpret the essays with NVivo. Two independent reviewers coded the essays. Themes were established by identifying connections between coded excerpts. Consensus was achieved through multiple rounds of discussion and iteratively reviewing each theme. Representative quotes were used to illustrate the themes. The themes confirmed the studentship was feasible during the pandemic. Perceived benefits of the program included mentorship and networking opportunities; gaining practical and fundamental knowledge in radiation oncology; developing clinical and research skills; and creating positive attitudes towards radiation oncology and the humanistic aspect of the field. The studentship supported medical specialty selection by helping define student values, shaping perceptions of the specialty, and promoting self-reflection upon students' personal needs. This study informs future iterations of the studentship to promote radiation oncology in Canadian medical school curricula. It serves as a model for studentships in other specialties that have limited exposure and similar challenges with medical student recruitment.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyStudents, MedicalCanadaCareer ChoiceHumansPandemicsEducationMedical specialty selectionMedical studentsRadiation oncologyStudentship

Identifiers

PMID38057504
OpenAlexW4389408736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.