ArticleScientific reports2023
Safety evaluation of PEGylated MNPs and p-PEGylated MNPs in SD rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Nanoparticles Against Superbugs: Mechanistic Insights, Biomedical Applications, and Translational Frontiers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Targeted therapeutic strategies for the kidney.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2024Review
- Research Progress of Disulfide Bond Based Tumor Microenvironment Targeted Drug Delivery System.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyethylene glycol-coated magnetic nanoparticles (PEGylated MNPs) have demonstrated prominent advantages in cancer diagnosis and hyperthermia therapy. However, there is currently lack of standard mode and sufficient toxicity data for determining the delayed risk of PEGylated MNPs. Nevertheless, the toxicity potentials, especially those associated with the oxidative stress, were ubiquitously reported. In this study, PEGylated MNPs and p-PEGylated MNPs were administrated to SD (Sprague Dawley) rats by single intravenously injection, and various toxicity indicators were monitored till 56 days post-administration for a comprehensive toxicity evaluation. We revealed that both nanoparticles could be rapidly cleared from plasma and enter tissues, such as, liver, kidneys and spleen, and p-PEGylated MNP is less prone to be accumulated in the tissues, indicating a lower toxicity risk. PEGylated MNPs were more likely to up-regulate the expression levels of Th2 type cytokines and trigger inflammatory pathways, but no related pathological change was found. Both MNPs are not mutagenic, while recoverable mild DNA damage associated with the presence of nanoparticles might also be observed. This study demonstrated a research approach for the non-clinical safety evaluation of nanoparticles. It also provided comprehensive valuable safety data for PEGylated and p-PEGylated MNPs, for promoting the clinical application and bio-medical translation of such MNPs with PEG modifications in the cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.