Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057395›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

Observational and genetic associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer: a UK Biobank and international consortia study.

Eleanor L Watts, Tomas I Gonzales, Tessa Strain, Pedro F Saint-Maurice, D Timothy Bishop, Stephen J Chanock, Mattias Johansson, Temitope O Keku, Loic Le Marchand, Victor Moreno and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02328677 (ColoCare Transdisciplinary Research in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02328677 recruitingnot on this map

ColoCare Transdisciplinary Research in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2007 to 2030Enrolled5,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Eleanor L Watts *Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9229-2589
Tomas I Gonzales *MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0085-8771
Tessa StrainMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Pedro F Saint-MauriceDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
D Timothy BishopLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8752-8785
Stephen J ChanockDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mattias JohanssonGenomics Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-5081
Temitope O KekuCenter for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Loic Le MarchandUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Victor MorenoOncology Data Analytics Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-5487
Polly A NewcombPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8786-0043
Christina C NewtonDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rish K PaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mark P PurdueDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Cornelia M UlrichHuntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Karl Smith-ByrneNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Bethany Van GuelpenDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Oncology Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
PRACTICAL consortium, CRUK, BPC3, CAPS, PEGASUS
Felix R DayMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3789-7651
Katrien WijndaeleMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nicholas J WarehamMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1422-2993
Charles E MatthewsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Steven C MooreDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Soren BrageMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Soren.Brage@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-7355

Funding

Cancer Risk in Human PopulationsZIACP010136 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$36.7M
Cancer Research UK 29017Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/4Medical Research Council MR/N003284/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association of fitness with cancer risk is not clear.

methodsWe used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of lung, colorectal, endometrial, breast, and prostate cancer in a subset of UK Biobank participants who completed a submaximal fitness test in 2009-12 (N = 72,572). We also investigated relationships using two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR), odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using the inverse-variance weighted method.

resultsAfter a median of 11 years of follow-up, 4290 cancers of interest were diagnosed. A 3.5 ml O DISCUSSION: Higher fitness levels may reduce risks of endometrial, colorectal, and breast cancer, though relationships with adiposity are complex and may mediate these relationships. Increasing fitness, including via changes in body composition, may be an effective strategy for cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCardiorespiratory FitnessColorectal NeoplasmsBiological Specimen BanksHumansMaleRisk FactorsUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID38057395
PMCPMC10781786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.