Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057377›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Infusion of propofol with bispectral index monitoring does not reduce the amount of propofol used during transvaginal oocyte retrieval procedure.

Sevgi Bilgen, Dilek Erdogan, Sabri Berkem Ökten

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05631925 (Comparison of Two Different Anesthesia Methods During Oocyte Retrieval for in Vitro Fertilization), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05631925 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of Two Different Anesthesia Methods During Oocyte Retrieval for in Vitro Fertilization

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcibadem UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled130ConditionsOocyte RetrievalArmspropofol bolus, propofol infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sevgi BilgenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Acibadem Kozyatagi Hospital, Ondokuz Mayıs Mah., Begonya Sokak., No:12 Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey. sevgibilgen@yahoo.com.
Dilek ErdoganDepartment of Anesthesiology, Acibadem Kozyatagi Hospital, Ondokuz Mayıs Mah., Begonya Sokak., No:12 Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sabri Berkem ÖktenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acibadem Kozyatagi Hospital, Ondokuz Mayıs Mah., Begonya Sokak., No:12 Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Acıbadem Kadıköy Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our study we aimed to investigate whether the use of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring would decrease total propofol consumption during the transvaginal oocyte retrieval procedure. This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. The study was conducted in the operating room, and postoperative recovery room. One hundred and thirty, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients, over age 18, undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval were included in this study. All patients were administered 2 μg/kg fentanyl, and 2 mg/kg propofol for the induction of anesthesia. The patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the group bolus were given 0.5 mg/kg of propofol when necessary, according to the observer's range of motion. Patients in the group BIS were given 10 mg/kg/h propofol infusion adjusted to keep the BIS value between 40 and 60. The primary outcome was the total dose of propofol administered per patient. The secondary outcomes were the time to reach the value of 5 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness Sedation Scale (MOASs), the time to reach Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) ≥ 9 of the patients, satisfaction of the patient, and the gynecologist. The amount of total propofol was higher in the group BIS than in the group bolus administered according to the patient's clinic. There was no difference in the time to reach the value of 5 on the MOASs between the groups. The time to reach PADSS ≥ 9 was longer in the group BIS than in the group bolus. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the satisfaction of the patient and the gynecologist. Administration of propofol as an infusion with BIS monitoring did not reduce the amount of propofol administered to patients during transvaginal oocyte retrieval.Clinical trial registration number: NCT05631925-30/11/2022.

Indexed as

PropofolAdolescentFentanylHumansOocyte RetrievalProspective StudiesFentanylPropofol

Identifiers

PMID38057377
PMCPMC10700325
OpenAlexW4389367163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.