Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38057331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Enhancing cochlear duct length estimation by incorporating second-turn parameters.

Asma Alahmadi, Yassin Abdelsamad, Anandhan Dhanasingh, Fida Almuhawas, Abdulrahman Alsanosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cochlear size variation among the Argentinian population.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asma Alahmadi *King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box: 245, 11411, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. asma0alahmadi@yahoo.com.
Yassin Abdelsamad *Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Anandhan DhanasinghMED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete Gesellschaft m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria.
Fida AlmuhawasKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box: 245, 11411, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlsanosiKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box: 245, 11411, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating insertion depth, cochlear duct length (CDL), and other inner ear parameters is vital to optimizing cochlear implantation outcomes. Most current formulas use only the basal turn dimensions for CDL prediction. In this study, we investigated the importance of the second turn parameters in estimating CDL. Two experienced neuro-otologists blindly used segmentation software to measure (in mm) cochlear parameters, including basal turn diameter (A), basal turn width (B), second-turn diameter (A2), second-turn width (B2), CDL, first-turn length, and second-turn length (STL). These readings were taken from 33 computed tomography (CT) images of temporal bones from anatomically normal ears. We constructed regression models using A, B, A2, and B2 values fitted to CDL, two-turn length, and five-fold cross-validation to ensure model validity. CDL, A value, and STL were longer in males than in females. The mean B2/A2 ratio was 0.91 ± 0.06. Adding A2 and B2 values improved CDL prediction accuracy to 86.11%. Therefore, we propose a new formula for more accurate CDL estimation using A, B, A2, and B2 values. In conclusion, the findings of this study revealed a notable improvement in the prediction of two-turn length (2TL), and CDL by clinically appreciable margins upon adding A2 and B2 values to the prediction formulas.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCochleaCochlear DuctFemaleHumansMaleTemporal BoneTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID38057331
PMCPMC10700305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.